REVIEWERS' PROFORMA

                                                                               PANACEA

                                                        RLKU MEDICAL & DENTAL COLLEGE

                                                          Reviewer’s Evaluation Proforma

  (Confidential – For Editorial Use Only

 Manuscript Title: ______________________________________________________________________
 Manuscript ID: ___________________________
 Date of Review: ___________________________

Section A: General Evaluation

1. Overall Recommendation

     ☐ Accept without revision                          ☐ Minor revision                             ☐ Major revision
     ☐ Reject but resubmission invited              ☐ Reject

Section B: Scientific Assessment

    Please grade each parameter:

Parameter	Excellent	Good	Fair	Poor
Originality / Novelty	☐	☐	☐	☐
Relevance to Journal Scope	☐	☐	☐	☐
Scientific Rigor	☐	☐	☐	☐
Clarity of Objectives	☐	☐	☐	☐
Appropriateness of Methodology	☐	☐	☐	☐
Statistical Analysis	☐	☐	☐	☐
Interpretation of Results	☐	☐	☐	☐
Discussion (Depth & Relevance)	☐	☐	☐	☐
References (Adequate & Current)	☐	☐	☐	☐
Quality of Language & Presentation	☐	☐	☐	☐

 

        Section C: Section-wise Comments

1. Title

☐ Appropriate                                       ☐ Needs modification
Comments/suggestions:

2. Abstract

☐ Structured appropriately                  ☐ Reflects objectives & findings            ☐ Requires revision
Comments/suggestions:

3. Introduction

Clear background provided? ☐ Yes ☐ No                         Rationale justified? ☐ Yes ☐ No
Comments/suggestions:

4. Materials & Methods

Study design appropriate? ☐ Yes ☐ No        Ethical approval mentioned? ☐ Yes ☐ No ☐ Not Applicable

Sample size justified? ☐ Yes ☐ No              Statistical methods appropriate? ☐ Yes ☐ No
Comments/suggestions:

5. Results

Data presentation clear? ☐ Yes ☐ No                 Tables/Figures appropriate? ☐ Yes ☐ No
Comments/suggestions:

6. Discussion & Conclusion

Findings critically analyzed? ☐ Yes  ☐ No               Comparison with recent literature? ☐ Yes ☐ No

Conclusion supported by results? ☐ Yes ☐ No
Comments/suggestions:

Section D: Ethical Considerations

Informed consent documented (if applicable)? ☐ Yes ☐ No       Conflict of interest disclosed? ☐ Yes ☐ No

                                                         Section E: Major Concerns (if any)

 

 

                                                      Section F: Minor Corrections (if any)

 

 Section G: Confidential Comments to the Editor

(Will not be shared with authors)                                                            

 

Reviewers’ Declaration

     ☐ I confirm that I have no conflict of interest regarding this manuscript.
     ☐ I have maintained confidentiality of the manuscript contents.

     Reviewer Name: _______________________________